How Brands Decide Which Language To Post In
The language a brand posts in is treated as a distribution decision and made by a translation vendor. It is a positioning decision, and handing it downstream is why so much regional content lands flat.
The default process is familiar: the campaign is conceived in English, approved in English, and then translated outward into whichever languages the media plan requires. Everything downstream inherits an idea that was built for a different audience.
Deciding which language to post in is not a translation task
A translated post carries the syntax and the reference points of the original. It is comprehensible and it is obviously imported, and audiences identify that instantly even when they cannot articulate what is off about it.
The alternative is not more expensive than it sounds. It means briefing in the target language from the start, and accepting that the resulting idea may not have an English equivalent worth producing. That last part is what most approval structures cannot accommodate.
The choice is rarely between English and one other language
It is usually between registers. Urban Indian social speech mixes languages within a sentence, and the mix itself carries meaning: which words stay English, which switch, and where the switch happens all signal something about who is speaking.
A brand posting in clean, formal Hindi is making a choice as specific as one posting in English, and often a more distancing one, because it does not sound like how the audience actually talks. Formality reads as officialdom, which is not usually the intent.
What the platform does to the decision
Each platform has a settled linguistic character in India, and posting against it is a decision rather than an oversight. Professional networks skew formal and English; short video skews vernacular and colloquial; the same brand sounding identical on both is failing at one of them.
Comment sections are the most reliable guide available. What language the audience replies in, and what they switch to when they are annoyed or delighted, is better evidence than any segmentation study, and it is free.
The cost question nobody states plainly
Making original work in four languages costs more than making it in one and translating it three times. That is the actual trade, and it is usually resolved silently in favour of the cheaper option without anyone arguing for it.
Worth stating explicitly: translated content is not a cheaper version of the same thing. It is a materially weaker product at a lower price, and it should be evaluated as such rather than as a saving.
A workable middle
Few brands can originate everything everywhere. The pragmatic version is to pick the one or two languages where the audience is genuinely concentrated and originate there properly, then let everything else be honestly and plainly translated without pretending otherwise.
That is better than spreading the same weak adaptation across eight languages, and it produces at least some work that sounds like it came from the place it is addressed to, which is the entire point of doing it at all.
Related on Ad Tribe
Advertisement
