The New Creative Skill Is Knowing When To Stop Generating
Every creative process used to end for a practical reason. The photographer had to be booked, the retoucher had a queue, the deadline arrived. Each of those was a reason to stop generating, and none of them exist any more.
This is the underrated consequence of cheap generation. It did not just make production faster. It removed the natural point at which someone had to decide that this was the one, because deciding was previously forced by cost.
Why Nobody Wants To Stop Generating
Because the next option might be better, and it costs nothing to find out. That is a rational thought each time it occurs and a corrosive one in aggregate. Fifty variants do not clarify a decision. They make the decision feel unfinished, which is a different and worse state than being undecided.
It also transfers badly to the client. A team that presents three routes has made a judgement. A team that presents thirty has outsourced one.
Optionality feels like progress right up to the moment it replaces the decision.
The Cost Nobody Books
Every hour spent reviewing a variant that was never going to be chosen is an hour not spent on the brief, and it does not appear anywhere as time lost because generating it was free. The saving and the waste sit in different columns.
What The Skill Actually Is
Not taste, exactly. Something narrower: recognising the point at which more looking stops improving the answer and starts protecting the person from having to commit.
That is a discipline, not a talent, and it is teachable in the way that editing is teachable. The people who will be valuable are not the ones who can generate the most. They are the ones who can walk into a room of a hundred options and leave with one, and say why. Every other part of the process got cheaper. That one did not. Related: Why 'Can We See More Options?' Is A Bigger Problem In The AI Era
Advertisement
