What A Treatment Looks Like When There Is No Shoot
A treatment has always been a document of intent. A director reads the script, says what they would do with it, and the client buys the sensibility as much as the plan.
When the film is generated rather than shot, that document changes job. There is no director's showreel behind it and no set where interpretation can happen, so the treatment has to carry everything itself.
What the treatment has to specify now
Things a crew would previously have decided in the room. The lens language and whether it stays consistent between shots. How the light behaves and where it comes from. Whether people are the same people from cut to cut, which is the failure most often visible in generated work.
Written loosely, a generated film drifts. Every shot is plausible and none of them belong to the same film.
What it still cannot specify
Performance. A treatment can describe a face and cannot describe timing, and timing is where most advertising humour and nearly all advertising warmth live. Teams working this way tend to write the moments that carry feeling for a real performer and generate the rest.
The disclosure the treatment now carries
A line stating what is generated, because the finished film will need to say so. The Advertising Standards Council of India's guidance on AI in advertising puts the obligation on the advertisement, not the process, and a treatment that leaves it vague passes the problem to whoever signs off.
Who approves it
The same people as before, reading a different document. The useful discipline is to make the treatment answer one question a shoot answers automatically. If two people follow this document separately, do they make the same film?
If the answer is no, the treatment is not finished, and the generation will find every gap in it.
More from Creative Room.