How Agencies Decide What To Enter For Awards
Somewhere in every agency there is a spreadsheet of the year's work with a column nobody enjoys filling in, which asks whether each piece is worth an entry fee.
Deciding what to enter for awards is not a celebration. It is a budget exercise with a creative argument running underneath it, and both sides of the building have to agree.
How agencies settle what to enter for awards
The longlist is everything that ran. The first cut removes anything that cannot be evidenced: no results, no client permission, no usable film. That usually halves it before any judgement of quality begins.
What survives is then sorted by what each piece can actually claim. A film with a strong idea and flat numbers and a workmanlike campaign with extraordinary numbers are entered into different places, and pretending otherwise wastes the fee.
The conversation with the client
Nothing goes in without it. The brand owns the results, the footage and in most cases the right to be named, and an entry that surprises a marketing team damages more than it wins. The Advertising Agencies Association of India has pushed for clearer agency and client terms for years, and credit on entries is one of the places loose terms show.
What gets held back on purpose
Work that is still running, because entering it early fixes a story the campaign has not finished telling. Work the client is not ready to discuss publicly. And work the agency knows is good but cannot yet evidence, which is usually held for the following year rather than entered thin.
Who writes the entry
Rarely the team that made the work, which sounds wrong and is not. The people closest to a campaign cannot see which part of it is unusual. A writer from another team, given the case and an hour with the strategist, tends to find the sentence the work is actually about.
That sentence is the entry. Everything else is supporting material.
More from Creative Room.